<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New standard IEC61439-2 for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear assemblies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/new-standard-iec61439-2-replaces-iec60439-1-for-low-voltage-switchgear-and-controlgear-assemblies.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/new-standard-iec61439-2-replaces-iec60439-1-for-low-voltage-switchgear-and-controlgear-assemblies.html</link>
	<description>Exchange experiences on electrical switchboard activity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:26:59 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: R K Kapur</title>
		<link>http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/new-standard-iec61439-2-replaces-iec60439-1-for-low-voltage-switchgear-and-controlgear-assemblies.html/comment-page-1#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>R K Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">Last week I met <strong>Jean-Paul Lionet</strong>, a member of IEC technical committee who participates to the evolution of Low Voltage Switchgear &amp; Control Gear Assemblies standards. Below is the summary he prepared for me. Don’t hesitate to add your#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>I feel that Type tests need to repeated for FBA&#039;s if devices mounted on them are different from the original test FBA. 

Different makes of devices have diifernt parameters for watt loss which may effect the temprature rise  or different terminal sizes / supporting arrangement etc. which may effect the short circuit withstand of busbars supporting system on ACB&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that Type tests need to repeated for FBA&#8217;s if devices mounted on them are different from the original test FBA. </p>
<p>Different makes of devices have diifernt parameters for watt loss which may effect the temprature rise  or different terminal sizes / supporting arrangement etc. which may effect the short circuit withstand of busbars supporting system on ACB&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ganesh Raykar</title>
		<link>http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/new-standard-iec61439-2-replaces-iec60439-1-for-low-voltage-switchgear-and-controlgear-assemblies.html/comment-page-1#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganesh Raykar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">Last week I met <strong>Jean-Paul Lionet</strong>, a member of IEC technical committee who participates to the evolution of Low Voltage Switchgear &amp; Control Gear Assemblies standards. Below is the summary he prepared for me. Don’t hesitate to add your#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>Dose we need to retest our samples which were tested recently under the old standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dose we need to retest our samples which were tested recently under the old standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/new-standard-iec61439-2-replaces-iec60439-1-for-low-voltage-switchgear-and-controlgear-assemblies.html/comment-page-1#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">Last week I met <strong>Jean-Paul Lionet</strong>, a member of IEC technical committee who participates to the evolution of Low Voltage Switchgear &amp; Control Gear Assemblies standards. Below is the summary he prepared for me. Don’t hesitate to add your#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>interesting question from Joy : I decided to give my point of view &lt;a href=&quot;http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/iec-61439-frequently-asked-questions-part-4.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in this dedicated article&lt;/a&gt;, for better visibility by others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting question from Joy : I decided to give my point of view <a href="http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/iec-61439-frequently-asked-questions-part-4.html" rel="nofollow">in this dedicated article</a>, for better visibility by others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo Pérez Izquierdo</title>
		<link>http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/new-standard-iec61439-2-replaces-iec60439-1-for-low-voltage-switchgear-and-controlgear-assemblies.html/comment-page-1#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Pérez Izquierdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">Last week I met <strong>Jean-Paul Lionet</strong>, a member of IEC technical committee who participates to the evolution of Low Voltage Switchgear &amp; Control Gear Assemblies standards. Below is the summary he prepared for me. Don’t hesitate to add your#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>The use of electrical protections of the same brand is very important when you desing an electrical system because it´s the only way to satisfay the requirements about coordination (selectivity and  shortcircuit energy limitation). All the electrical protections are located in electrical swithboards and panelboards then all of them have to belong the same manufacturer. When you use electrical protections from different brands or manufacturers, it´s impossible to achieve it.  
On the other hand, it´s very important to comply with IEC 439-2 standard because you can offer a  tested assembly to your clients if you follow all the manufacturer recomemdations about it, for example, the Prisma Plus System from Schneider Electric. The IEC 439-2 states ten tests that you have to do, the manufacturer makes seven of them in the factory and you have only to do three tests at your workshop. It´s true that the type tested assemblies are much more expensive, but you can achieve much more security and reliability and as a result much more reliability in the electrical service continuity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of electrical protections of the same brand is very important when you desing an electrical system because it´s the only way to satisfay the requirements about coordination (selectivity and  shortcircuit energy limitation). All the electrical protections are located in electrical swithboards and panelboards then all of them have to belong the same manufacturer. When you use electrical protections from different brands or manufacturers, it´s impossible to achieve it.<br />
On the other hand, it´s very important to comply with IEC 439-2 standard because you can offer a  tested assembly to your clients if you follow all the manufacturer recomemdations about it, for example, the Prisma Plus System from Schneider Electric. The IEC 439-2 states ten tests that you have to do, the manufacturer makes seven of them in the factory and you have only to do three tests at your workshop. It´s true that the type tested assemblies are much more expensive, but you can achieve much more security and reliability and as a result much more reliability in the electrical service continuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://panelbuilder.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-standards/new-standard-iec61439-2-replaces-iec60439-1-for-low-voltage-switchgear-and-controlgear-assemblies.html/comment-page-1#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">Last week I met <strong>Jean-Paul Lionet</strong>, a member of IEC technical committee who participates to the evolution of Low Voltage Switchgear &amp; Control Gear Assemblies standards. Below is the summary he prepared for me. Don’t hesitate to add your#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Does the new standard , require the panel builder to supply only ,the same branded circuit breakers ,which were used on the type tested assembly in their client panels ?

Is so , doesn&#039;t it limit the available options for the panel builder as he will be restricted with only one brand of circuit breakers for all his future projects?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the new standard , require the panel builder to supply only ,the same branded circuit breakers ,which were used on the type tested assembly in their client panels ?</p>
<p>Is so , doesn&#8217;t it limit the available options for the panel builder as he will be restricted with only one brand of circuit breakers for all his future projects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
